Happy's Essential Skills: Metrics and Dimensional Analysis

Reading time ( words)

After reading 20 of my columns, by now you probably realize that I am an analytical person. Thus, I dedicate this column to the topic of metrics—the method of measuring something. I mentioned the four levels of metrics in my column entitled Producibility and Other Figures of Merit back in June of this year. Additionally, I introduced the five stages of metrics in the second part of the following column, Design for Manufacturing and Assembly, Part 2 later that same month. This column completes the discussion of metrics with the subject of dimensionless quantities. 

The use of a dimensionless quantity is a common way to study a wide variety of physical phenomena or engineering problems. A dimensionless equation, algebraic or differential, involves variables without physical dimensions. For example, most people prefer to know the Mach number rather than the speed because it's easier to compare performance. These numbers (coefficients or factors) are part of the physical world and exist in many applications. More than 1200 dimensionless quantities are used in science, economics, medicine, geophysics and ecology. Avogadro’s number is one used in chemistry. This column will talk only about those used in engineering for thermodynamics, thermomechanics, fluid mechanics, solid mechanics and electromagnetics. 


These numbers or factors are essential in modern industry and science. These numbers are the Figure of Merit that I describe in Column #9. They allow us to quantify those physical or mental activities that otherwise would fall into the realm of opinion or conjecture. One that I have used for the last 40 years for printed circuit fabrication is the complexity index. This index allows me to model (from design information) the first pass yield in PCB fabrication with only a 3−7% error.[1–3]. Using this process, many other factors can be created that will simplify working with complex systems in design, fabrication or assembly. Use the process any place where you need to measure something that right now is just an opinion. 

Dimensional Systems

Every numerical characteristic used in engineering comprises three elements:

  • name
  • magnitude
  • dimension 

There are two types of dimensions: fundamental and derived. Fundamental dimensions cannot be expressed in terms of other dimensions, and they serve as building blocks for more complex, derived dimensions. 

Sometimes, a group of fundamental dimensions has a dedicated name, which is then called a unit. A special class of units are those with a dimension of one, which result when all the fundamental dimensions of the unit cancel. Although not entirely accurate, such units are called dimensionless parameters. These units are frequently called number, ratio, index, factor, effect, or coefficient. Examples include Mach number, Slenderness ratio, Toms effect, Reynolds number, and friction coefficient. The advantage of these absolute numbers is that their numerical values are independent of the dimensional system used. 

All dimensional systems in use today can be classified according to whether they use the metric or American/British system and whether they use force or mass as a fundamental dimension. Force-based systems include the metric MKS force and American/British engineering systems. Mass-based systems include the SI and British mass systems. 

  • MKS: Fundamental dimensions are meter (m), kilogram (kg), and second (s), where kg means force. Mass has a derived dimension of kg-s2/m. Until recently, this system was widely used in engineering in continental Europe and is still favored by many there. 
  • American/British engineering: Fundamental dimensions are foot (or inch), pound (lb), and second, where lb means force. Accordingly, the dimensions of mass are lb-s2/ft (also called the slug) or lb-s2/in. 
  • SI: Fundamental dimensions are kilogram (for mass), meter, and second. Force is a derived dimension, with the unit Newton. SI actually has seven fundamental dimensions, and also includes ampere, degrees Kelvin, mole, and candella. 
  • British Mass: Here, pound is the dimension of mass and is legally equivalent to 0.45359237 kg in SI. Force is a derived dimension, and its unit is poundal, which is numerically equivalent to the force necessary to impart l-ft./s2 acceleration to a 1-lb mass. One poundal is equivalent to 0.138254954 kg-m/s2 in SI, which is nearly 0.5 oz. in the American/British engineering system. 

Mass-based systems have the advantage that this dimension is independent of the numerical value of gravitational acceleration g, which even at sea level can vary as much as 0.5% with latitude. Therefore, the use of a mass-based system is uniform anywhere in the universe. 

On the other hand, having mass as a fundamental dimension is impractical in everyday life because mass cannot be directly perceived or measured. Rather, mass must be determined indirectly by subjecting it to a known inertial or gravitational acceleration and measuring the force generated. 

Dimensional Analysis

In engineering, dimensional analysis is the analysis of the relationships between different physical factors/quantities by using their fundamental dimensions (such as mass, length, time, electrical charge, or temperature, etc.) and unit of measure (such as Fahrenheit vs. Centigrade, miles vs. kilometers, or pounds vs. kilograms) and comparing these dimensions as calculations. Converting from one-dimensional unit to another is often somewhat complex. Dimensional analysis, or more specifically the factor-label method, also known as the unit-factor method, is a widely used technique for such conversions using the rules of algebra. 

From a discussion on ResearchGate[4], the Professor Issam Sinjab commented, “But on a more abstract level, dimensional analysis allows you to abstract over a wide variety of phenomena, and gives insight to regimes where some parameters vanish and can be ignored. The Reynolds number in hydrodynamics is a good example of this. At very low Reynolds number, many terms in the equations vanish, and thus systems can be approximated by very simple equations (laminar flow) even though flow at all Reynolds numbers is fundamentally governed by the Navier-Stokes equation.”

For another interesting example of this, the mathematician G. I. Taylor used dimensionless forms of certain equations to figure out highly classified and secret information about the atomic bomb in the 1940s. 

The purposes of dimensionless equations are: 

  • To simplify the equation(s) by reducing the number of variables used
  • To analyze system behavior regardless of the unit used to measure variables
  • To rescale parameters and variables so that all computed quantities are of same order (relatively similar magnitudes)
  • To scale-up physical systems from experiment to production 

The concept of physical dimension was introduced by Joseph Fourier in 1822. Physical quantities that have the same common measure have the same dimension; if they have different dimensions, they are incommensurable. For example, it is pointless to ask whether a gram is less, the same, or more than a minute. 



Suggested Items

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

04/30/2021 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
This week’s biggest news came in the form of industry briefings—there were a lot of them and the news was universally positive. The news you need to read for this week includes three reports from IPC detailing: the strength and risks in the global economic recovery; a strong EMS book-to-bill ratio; and strong North American PCB sales. Zeroing in on a single company, Apple reported a significant jump in revenue.

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

04/23/2021 | Andy Shaughnessy, I-Connect007
This week, we bring you a wide swath of news, columns, and articles from the past week. Altium announced a new cloud platform that connects design stakeholders with users of its Altium 365 environment. Cadence Design Systems has acquired a company that develops computational fluid dynamics technology to help expand its system analysis offerings.

A Show Full of Opportunities

04/16/2021 | Tara Dunn, Averatek
Looking back to my notes from IPC APEX 2020, I noticed one of my comments: There were so many interesting sessions that I often found myself in the position of choosing between several that I wanted to attend in the same timeslot. This year was not any different in that regard. I am purposely glossing over the fact that I, like many of my friends, missed the camaraderie and opportunity to catch up in person while attending these technical sessions, and I look forward to being able to do that next year.

Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.