Patty’s Perspective: Everything You Want to Know about Vias but Were Afraid to Ask


Reading time ( words)

“Via” is one of those words appropriated by our industry and completely redefined—one of hundreds, I believe (think of mouse bites, tombstones, etc.). In my mom’s old Funk and Wagnall’s Dictionary (1968), “via” is defined as a preposition: “By way of; by a route passing through.” Merriam-Webster online today has the same basic definition: “By going through… By way of (a particular place).” Not a noun as we so blithely use it and not a thing about very small holes and electrical connections. But in our industry, IPC defines no less than seven types of vias (a noun!). (See Keith Sellers’ column for those.)

Regarding our survey on vias, almost 85% of our respondents said they used blind/buried vias. And since 15% of those answering were either suppliers or consultants, it seems that approximately 100% use the B/Bs. OK then, on to a tougher question. We then asked how often, and it turns out that “use” covers everything from rarely to pretty much all the time, with a definite undercurrent of “because we have to.”

When asked about thermal vias, over 82% of respondents said they use them and nearly as many expect to see increasing numbers of them, as one person noted, “Absolutely. ICs are getting smaller and hotter.” We asked several other open-ended questions, including, “What are the greatest challenges you face when it comes to vias?” The number of different responses was widely varied and seemed to cover everything: impedance match, routing density, aspect ratio, annular ring, DFM, diminishing pad size, cost efficiency, tenting, filling, via-in-pad, CAF concerns, signal integrity, plating, equipment, reliability concerns… And of course, density, density, density.

We also asked, “What are the greatest challenges in back-drilling your vias?” We received many different answers here, too: not enough internal copper clearance, thickness variations, alignment of primary drill to backdrill, stub length tolerance, machine precision, spacing, via integrity, processing time, and finally, “the solution is to avoid back drilling.” Ouch, I think back-drill is a pain point.

 

Editor's Note: To read this entire article, which appeared in the November 2016 issue, click here.

Share


Suggested Items

IPC 6012-DA Revisions: The Approach to Cleanliness, Thickness, Inspection, and Wicking

04/13/2018 | Jan Pedersen, ELMATICA
IPC’s Automotive Addendum task group was started in November 2014 and the first edition of IPC 6012-DA was released in April 2016. We are now working on the revised version, and expect a release in Q2 2018. As standards need to evolve, develop and follow the needs of the industry, this work is continuous.

Conversations on the Floor: IPC APEX EXPO 2018

04/11/2018 | Steve Williams, The Right Approach Consulting LLC
This year’s show was one of the best in recent history, both in attendance and enthusiasm. The exhibit floor was sold out, and every single person I talked to was extremely optimistic about business in 2018. What follows are a series of observations and excerpts from conversations I had with some of the most interesting people I met.

The PCB Dinosaurs Get New Life at IPC APEX EXPO 2018

04/09/2018 | Dan Feinberg, FeinLine Associates, Inc.
The Order of the PCB Dinosaurs (originally called the PWB Dinosaurs—the sign of a true dino) was born because of a comment almost 20 years ago by my good friend Bernie Kessler. Back in the day, when suppliers like us became IPC members, we could only be associate members; unlike fabricators, we could not serve on the board and we could not lead key committees.



Copyright © 2018 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.