New Methods for Quantifying PCB Design Weaknesses and Manufacturing Challenges


Reading time ( words)

Nolan Johnson recently spoke with Summit Interconnect’s Gerry Partida about disruptive new methods for analyzing and quantifying potential manufacturing challenges in designs while still in the design phase.

Nolan Johnson: Gerry, what’s the background for the new methods we’re about to discuss?

Gerry Partida: The industry is at a new point in evolving how we look at building boards. Our industry has historically built boards and then tried to find a test for them. Then, when they found a test for it, they figured out that it needed to be analyzed before they built the board. We did this with electrical test. We built boards and down the road, as people started asking, “Why am I buying bad boards? We should electrically test them,” electrical test was introduced, reluctantly, into the test part of manufacturing printed circuit boards by suppliers or fabricators. Then they embraced it. But when we started testing boards, we did comparison tests. We would build a bunch of boards, put the first one on a tester, tell it to self-learn, and compare all the boards to the first board. If they all matched, they all shipped as matched boards, but if they had the same defect, they all shipped with the same defect. This did happen.

It wasn’t for another 10 or 15 years that we took extracted netlist from the CAD software and compared it to the Gerber data that would be used to fabricate the board, to find out whether everything was corrected before we started manufacturing. We would find that there was a problem, and we would fix it or get new data. Then when we knew we had a match, we started to manufacture the boards and downloaded the program to the tester. But this was an evolution of about 15 to 25 years. It depends on what point of view you take from it.

We’ve done the same thing with microvias. We’ve been building microvias. There are datasheets that talk about the modulus and the CTE expansion after reflow, before Tg, and after Tg, but no one really would do any math or science behind it. The PCB fabricator would just build the boards and ship them. Sometimes there are assembly problems, and the industry says, “There’s something going on with microvias. Three-stack and four-stack are not as safe as a single microvia and staggering them.” Everybody is trying to find out how strong or how weak they are. Most people were finding out at assembly because the standard IPC-6012 performance specs in the evaluation couldn’t identify a weak microvia very well. So, we came up with the OM tester, which is using the IPC-TM 650 2.6.27 test method, which actually takes a coupon with the same structures that are in the board and simulates reflow on the coupon before we ship the boards.

If that structure, which is in the board that we’re trying to ship, can survive reflow in a tester, then we know that the boards are more than likely going to pass and survive reflow and assembly. This works great. It will tell fabricators that if we process everything right, the board is going to be reliable through reflow. However, after a couple years of having the tester, we discovered we did everything right, but occasionally it wasn’t working. They were failing 6X reflow. Utilizing our extensive experience in microvia fabrication, our portfolio of reliability testing data, materials expertise and software tools, we can simulate the stack-up; you can actually input the microvia structure and the data output will tell you if it can survive six reflows or not.

To read this entire conversation, which appeared in the November 2021 issue of PCB007 Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

09/30/2022 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
This week, our five must-reads include the IPC report on the EMS industry and a report on ICs for the automotive market. Add to that Lockheed’s highest powered DoD laser yet, IPC’s APEX keynote announcement, and—for you conference and expo junkies—a calendar of upcoming industry events. I can’t help but notice that much of our news is about, well, something new. In this case, my editor’s picks for the week capture new technology, new perspectives, new ways to communicate content, and new developments that we can expect to see in our future daily life. To borrow a phrase from the TV show “Firefly,” everything is “shiny” this week. I will be at PCB West, the IPC Advanced Packaging symposium, SMTA International, and electronica. If you see me, say hello, and share something cool about the part of the industry you’re in.

A Focus on Process Control, Part 1

09/27/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Michael Carano is a noted subject matter expert with respect to process control, electroplating and metallization technology, surface finishing, and reliability. So, it was only natural that we sat down to talk about mechanizing an existing facility given today’s fickle environment. Will any of the CHIPS funding trickle down to bare board fabrication? What process can be adjusted on the factory floor? The focus needs to be more than just on manufacturing and getting work out the door, he says, but also process control.

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

09/23/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
It’s officially fall now, and in Atlanta the temperature has plummeted to the mid-80s. We’ve all bumped our air conditioners up to 74 degrees. That means it’s trade show season, and I’ve been busy looking for my suitcase. This week, we have an assortment of news about associations, education, and advocacy, as well as another installment of our Printed Electronics Roundtable. And if you’re looking for a job, you are in luck; our jobConnect007 section is chock-full of open positions at all levels in this industry.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.