Addressing the Gap in Process Performance


Reading time ( words)

The first steps in process improvement are to determine what the gap is and why it happens. Having a process is not sufficient; the process needs to be effective as well. For those responsible for creating and maintaining processes, the ultimate goal is to create a procedure that becomes self-perpetuating, that seeps into the fabric of the company’s culture. For better or worse, plenty of procedures do indeed become ingrained in company culture. How does one go about ensuring that company culture is loaded with effective processes that deliver a positive outcome? That is the question, to be sure. 

Analyzing Performance Problems, authored by Robert Mager and Peter Pipe, was published in 1970. Even 50 years later, it is still one of the most definitive—and digestible—books on the topic of skill gap analysis. Their model presents a thorough and effective method for troubleshooting performance problems. 

According to Pipe and Mager, first identify the performance problem. To do so, make the key metrics:

  • Measurable
  • Observable
  • Performance-based 

Armed with the metrics, the next questions are critical to the analysis: 

  • Is it worth solving?
  • Can we apply fast fixes?
  • Are the consequences appropriate?
  • Is there skill deficiency?
  • Are there other causes?
  • Which solutions are the best? 

This analysis process is captured in the flowchart for Mager and Pipe’s model.

While this model might seem almost simplistic, my personal experience is that the power of the model comes from the simplicity. This model is not attempting to determine the specific fix; that is a separate scope. Instead, Mager and Pipe are merely attempting to perform the triage, to identify the nature of the breakdown in performance. Once the root cause of the breakdown is understood, the type of resolution can be determined. How exactly that resolution is implemented, of course, is often highly situationally dependent. There may be more than one solution, in fact. And in terms of the current challenges in upskilling, is this 50-year-old method still meaningful? 

To read this entire article, which appeared in the April 2022 issue of PCB007 Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

EIPC Summer Conference 2022: Day 2 Review

06/29/2022 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
Örebro, Sweden on June 15 brought a bright and early start to Day 2 of the EIPC Summer Conference for those who had enjoyed the previous evening’s networking dinner, but had resisted the temptation to over-indulge or to carry on their long-awaited catch-up conversations with old friends into the small hours. All but a few were in their seats for 9 a.m., awake and attentive for Session 4 of the conference, on the theme of new process technologies, moderated by Martyn Gaudion, CEO of Polar Instruments.

Technica Heats Up ROI Discussion

05/17/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
The I-Connect007 Editorial Team speaks with Technica’s Frank Medina, Ed Carrigan, and Jason Perry about trending hotspots that provide the PCB fabricator a high return on investment (ROI). A theme that carries throughout the conversation is that traditional methods for calculating ROI are being replaced by models that include more qualitative factors.

Training the Future Manufacturing Labor Force

04/19/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
To better understand what’s needed for upskilling your labor force in today’s job climate, we reached out to Sunstone Circuits, a PCB fabricator in the Pacific Northwest. We posed our set of questions to individuals in three departments to hear their perspectives depending on what area they work in. The following are the questions and answers from Michael Connella, operations manager; Matt Stevenson, vice president of sales and marketing; and Debra Coburn, human resources manager.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.