Dry Film Photoresist Adhesion Tests


Reading time ( words)

Laminate construction, chemical composition of the copper foil surface and its topography, resist composition, lamination conditions, and hold times all affect dry film photoresist adhesion, conformation, and, ultimately PWB yields. This area has been studied extensively over the years.

A number of resist adhesion test methods have been employed to test different surfaces and process conditions with regard to dry film adhesion. The constant in such studies is a given dry film resist that is tested on different copper surfaces and under different process conditions. Conversely, one can keep the laminate construction and copper foil preparation as well as lamination conditions and hold times the same, while testing the adhesion characteristics of different films.

There are several failure modes, or sources of yield losses, if the copper surface is not properly prepared. Failure may be due to insufficient or excessive adhesion:

1. Failure to achieve good adhesion in a print-and-etch process will cause etchant attack under the resist and ultimately an “open” defect.

2. Failure to achieve good adhesion in a plating process will cause tin/lead underplating, ultimately leading to shorting defects (“shorts”).

3. Failure to achieve good release of unexposed resist during development can cause etch retardation in a print-and-etch process, ultimately leading to shorts.

4. Failure to achieve good release of unexposed resist during development in a plating process can cause poor adhesion of the plated copper to the copper base (copper-copper peelers).

5. Failure to achieve good release of exposed resist in a print-and-etch process on innerlayers can inhibit the formation of copper oxide multilayer bonder (or alternative bonders) on such a copper surface.

6. Failure to achieve good release of exposed resist in a plating process can cause etch retardation.

Read the full column here.


Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the October 2014 issue of The PCB Magazine.

Share




Suggested Items

PCB Technologies’ InPack to Focus on Miniaturization, Packaging

05/16/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
I recently spoke with PCB Technologies’ Jeff De Serrano, Yaniv Maydar, and Alon Menache about their new venture, InPack. They explain their plans to focus on advanced packaging, miniaturization, and other high-end technology, with much faster time to market, and they offer a view of the global market as well.

EIPC Technical Snapshot: Supporting Autonomous Driving

05/12/2022 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
EIPC’s 17th Technical Snapshot webinar on May 4 focused on developments in automotive electronics, particularly on advances in the technologies required to support the evolution of autonomous driving. The team brought together two expert speakers to present their detailed views on topics encompassed within “CASE,” the acronym that appears to be taking over the automotive industry.

Catching up with EISO Enterprises’ President Gary Chien

04/19/2022 | Dan Beaulieu, D.B. Management Group
While there are many Chinese companies now selling in the United States, I wanted to find one in Taiwan that is penetrating the U.S. market. I was delighted to come across EISO Enterprise Co. Ltd., a printed circuit board fabricator located in Taiwan. I know that the American companies are usually looking for PCB global partners in countries other than China, which made my conversation with Gary (Jung Kun) Chien all the more interesting, especially when he shared his thoughts on the U.S-China trade wars.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.