A Process Engineer's Guide to Effectively Troubleshooting PWB Defects

Reading time ( words)

The printed wiring board fabrication process is an intricate maze of interrelated steps, both chemical and mechanical. A thorough understanding of each of the process steps is critical in minimizing or eliminating non-conforming defects—the ones that cost the fabricator money and can lead to lost customers. It is also critical to note that these profit-killing defects may have their origins elsewhere in the process. That is the difficult thing about troubleshooting—the defect is often blamed on the process (such as electrodeposition of copper) because that is where the problem is first discovered. However, this is often false, as the origin of the defect may have had its humble beginnings in a previous process step. To be successful at troubleshooting a problem, common sense usually applies. Basically one must first:

  • Identify the problem or problems (be as specific as possible)
  • Determine possible causes (looks for links to those other less obvious processes)
  • Identify methods and procedures to test to see which causes apply
  • Test the assumptions
  • Implement corrective action

While this sounds like an oversimplification, this approach is required to properly identify and attack the problem at hand. A structured routine is really what is required.   In upcoming columns we will attempt to provide some insight as to the cause or causes of non-conforming defects and the potential solutions. We will discuss process parameters and the importance of control of the processes. Let’s discuss the step-by-step methodology for troubleshooting.

Identify the Problem or Problems
first and foremost, you must have a clear sense of what you are looking at. In troubleshooting, I firmly believe in the team approach to solving the problem. However, the team must agree on what the defect is: is it hole wall pull-away (HWPA) or resin recession; is this an interconnect defect (ICD) or simply a line of demarcation? These are just a few examples.

Read the full article here.


Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the April 2016 issue of The PCB Magazine.



Suggested Items

The ICT 2019 Christmas Seminar

12/16/2019 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
Since 2016, the Institute of Circuit Technology (ICT) has held its northern area Christmas seminar at the Majestic Hotel in Harrogate—the elegant and historic English spa town in North Yorkshire. Pete Starkey provides an overview of this popular ICT event.

Calumet Electronics and Averatek Team Up on A-SAP

12/02/2019 | Nolan Johnson, PCB007
Nolan Johnson talks with Brian Hess of Calumet Electronics and Mike Vinson of Averatek about the new, insertable additive processes that the companies are working on together to help factories running primarily subtractive processes to quickly convert to very high-density interconnect (HDI) features, including trace and space from 2.5-mil line and space to 1-mil line and space and below.

Decreasing Bend Radius and Improving Reliability- Part II

11/22/2019 | Kelsey Smith, All Flex
Many of the issues that arise when using a flex circuit come from a lack of knowledge about how to properly design one, especially when the circuit is required to bend. Many novices will design a circuit that calls for bending the flex in too tight of a bend radius, which can cause damage to the circuit and lower the reliability of the end product. This series of articles will focus on the seven key aspects to consider when designing for maximum durability and maximum “flexibility.”

Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.