Against the Density Wall: Landless Vias Might be the Answer


Reading time ( words)

You may not know about landless vias. This has been a well-kept secret for the last 30 years, possibly because it is not permitted on military boards, and therefore, discouraged in all IPC standards. Consequently, when our Japanese partner, OKI Electric, showed us their landless via boards, we said, “You can’t do that; the vias have to have lands!” They replied, “You’ve been listening to IPC again! Try it out and test it!” So we created a test vehicle and tested thousands of vias with various diameters against numerous annular ring vias. Guess what? They were right! As the annular ring got smaller, the failures occurred earlier until we got to landless, and then they jumped to 10X fewer failures. Not understanding this result, the PhDs of HP labs went to work and came up with an explanation (included in this paper). This was so radical a discovery that HP made the data, explanations and results proprietary and a company secret.

Introduction

I saw my first landless via multilayer while visiting NEC at Toyama, Japan back in 1985.

They were an enormous automated facility making Japanese telecom and mainframe computer boards, kind of like IBM and Western Electric rolled into one. NEC was using the liquid electrophoretic, positive-acting photoresist process with panel-plating. I wouldn’t see another landless via multilayer until our Japanese partner (OKI) introduced it to us in 1988. OKI was using the landless vias to achieve higher density without having to pay the extra costs of finer lines. They knew about the higher reliability that resulted, and they had done their own testing, but were after the higher routing density and it allowed them to route five traces between 0.100 inch PTH centers.

The Electrodeposited-Positive Acting Photoresist

My first introduction to the positive-acting photoresist (+PR) was at Hewlett-Packard’s integrated circuit fabrication facility in Palo Alto, California in 1970. HP used this in the liquid form and it was spin-coated on wafers. The photoresist was supplied by Shipley Company of Newton, Massachusetts. I was further exposed to the +PR after moving to the printed circuit fabrication facility.

Read the full article here.

 

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the June 2016 issue of The PCB Magazine.

Share




Suggested Items

PCBAA Reacts to Implications of Biden’s PCB Determination

04/05/2023 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Hot on the heels of the news that U.S. President Biden signed a presidential determination in support of the printed circuit board industry, I-Connect007’s Nolan Johnson spoke with David Schild, executive director of the Printed Circuit Board Association of America, about some of the expected implications. David points out, among other things, that this signals increased momentum with government and defense to support U.S.-based printed circuit manufacturing, and the possibility that a renewed interest in the industry by private financing could possibly follow.

Invested in Growth

04/04/2023 | Barry Matties, I-Connect007
The I-Connect007 team paid a visit to American Standard Circuits in West Chicago, Illinois. While there, we talked at length with CEO Anaya Vardya about the issues on his mind as he pushes technology, expands his floor space, and considers the implications of the CHIPS Act, staffing issues, and what’s happening in China.

Bigelow: Bullish on Fab’s Future

03/27/2023 | Nolan Johnson, PCB007
Twenty-plus years is a long time to lead a business during a long decline in the industry, but IMI President and CEO Peter Bigelow remains quite confident about the future. The company is in a strong financial position, running well, and looking at new technologies. So, what’s his biggest challenge? It’s not much different than any other manufacturer you talk to, and while he may not have all the answers, he’s clearly got insight to share.



Copyright © 2023 I-Connect007 | IPC Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.