SMT Solver: Choosing the Right Defect

I am intrigued by the theme of this month’s issue—“What You Need to Know”—because it is such a broad subject. There are lots of things we need to know. So, like most of you, I could hardly wait to read this issue of SMT007 Magazine myself. While others focus on addressing various aspects of this expansive topic, I will address some key issues that I think are important for us all to be aware of and learn about. And before I proceed, I am going to make some assumptions about my readers to narrow the focus of this column. The subjects are not technical but managerial, and the target audience is managers in the SMT assembly industry and engineers who aspire to be future managers.

Why is it important? Most companies attempt to achieve higher yield in SMT products through trial and error at considerable expense and frustration. Even though we have been manufacturing SMT products in high volume for almost three decades now, less than 10% of companies have first-pass yield (FPY) of more than 90%. In other words, 90% of companies are conducting too much rework. Rework adds to the cost of the product and reduces the reliability of solder joints due to an increase in intermetallic thickness each time the solder joint is reflowed. So, what are the reasons for this high defect rate? 

• The processes are at very high speeds, and machines must perform them

• The equipment must be characterized thoroughly; this can be defined as understanding all parameters that affect the equipment’s performance, and vendors may say it is easy, but it is not

• Most large companies have assigned engineers to optimize, and most small companies learn as they go, but learning as you go is not an option because revenue or product schedules (or both) may be impacted adversely

With the advent of fine- and ultra-fine-pitch, high-pin-count BGAs—0402, 0201, and 01005 resistors and capacitors—as well as the widespread use of no-clean flux, yield problems are getting worse, especially when you use large BGAs and BTCs in addition to a smattering of through-hole components on the same board in a lead-free process.

To read this entire column, which appeared in the December 2019 issue of SMT007 Magazine, click here.

Back

2020

SMT Solver: Choosing the Right Defect

01-17-2020

Ray Prasad addresses some key issues that are important for all of us to be aware of and learn about, especially for managers in SMT assembly and engineers who aspire to be future managers. Topics covered include choosing the right defect and developing a DFM and process recipe.

View Story
Back

2019

SMT Solver: Today’s Soldering Options

11-22-2019

If you have to deal with mixed-assembly boards with both surface-mount and through-hole components—as is the case today for more than 95% of electronic products—the selection of a soldering process becomes more complex, especially if you use both tin-lead and lead-free components on the same board.

View Story

SMT Solver: How Standards Impact You and Your Company

11-06-2019

Standardization is one of the key issues in promoting any new technology, but it is almost mandatory for SMT because of the need for automation to promote consistency in quality. Standards make the market grow faster than it would without them. A good standard benefits both users and suppliers. For example, if the package size tolerances are tightly controlled (within the requirement of the standard), the user can properly design the land pattern and use the same design for all suppliers of that package.

View Story

SMT Solver: Would You Prefer Shorts or Opens in Your Products?

07-29-2019

Would you prefer shorts or opens in your products? Of course, neither. But what if you do have to choose? Ray Prasad says he would choose a more desirable defect, if there is such a thing. But what is a desirable defect? A defect that would never escape inspection and test and would be caught before shipping the product to the customer. Read on why.

View Story

SMT Solver: Benchmarking Defect Levels in Your Products

06-17-2019

In this column, Ray Prasad discusses why zero defects may be a desirable goal but not a realistic one. He also shares some industry data as proof, which you can also use to benchmark defect levels in your products. Finally, he also addresses the choices when selecting components that have a big impact on the level of defects you should expect.

View Story

SMT Solver: Assemblers Can Help Customers Reduce Cost, Improve Reliability

05-08-2019

It is commonly assumed that the level of defects is primarily dependent on how the assemblers control their manufacturing processes. This sort of mistaken belief will cause you to never find the root cause of the problem. Hence, the problem will persist forever. And just because defects are discovered in manufacturing does not mean that they were created in manufacturing. Find out why.

View Story
Back

2014

Flux Classification

02-15-2014

In the previous column, I discussed flux functions and general considerations in their selection. In my next three columns, I will review various types of fluxes.

View Story

Major Types of Fluxes

01-20-2014

Organic acid (OA) fluxes are stronger than rosin fluxes but weaker than inorganic fluxes.

View Story
Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.