Alun Morgan on the Future of PCB Materials


Reading time ( words)

The I-Connect007 editorial team asked Alun Morgan, technology ambassador for Ventec International Group, to discuss materials at a high level. Our conversation delivered a detailed overview of the current state of the electronics industry. Put industry experts like Alun Morgan, Happy Holden, Patty Goldman, Barry Matties, Andy Shaughnessy, and Nolan Johnson together on the topic of materials, and the results are enlightening, to say the least.

Barry Matties: Thanks for taking the time to speak with us, Alun. We always appreciate the conversation.

Nolan Johnson: Today’s topic is materials, and as you know, there’s a great deal of demand from automotive, IoT, and other new technologies. These sectors are pushing the limits for designers and materials. We want to investigate what’s going on with the development of materials in the marketplace.

Matties: Also, there are so many choices out there. How do people navigate the options and make the proper choice?

Alun Morgan: That’s always a challenge. People publish lots of data sheets on new products, so it is difficult sometimes. Right now, there are a few drivers. The last driver was reliability, and the last transition for the past 15–20 years has been to improve reliability. Also, 5G is very hot and an enabler to help us move on with IoT, autonomous driving, etc. Now, we’re seeing a huge demand for products that will help enable the 5G rollout and revolution, which is coming towards the end of this year. Further, 5G brings a lot of issues because of the data rates. An entire infrastructure will have to be built. It’s probably the next big rollout of infrastructure since the technology boom around the late ‘90s with the huge amount of infrastructure built into the network that we’re still using today. There are two parts that concern PCB materials—the dielectric and conductor—and both have challenges with high speed.

Normally, in the digital space, people run 10– 20 Gbps fairly routinely, and that can be managed. But once you reach higher speeds and data rates—as we’ve seen with radar products, for example—then the substrate itself becomes a bit of an issue because the substrate is a dielectric. It can be polarized by high-frequency signals, so if you think back to when they showed you the north and south poles on magnets in school, north and south poles on magnets, you can align all of these by putting a magnet on the top. If you switch it around, all of the poles switch around the other way.

Alternating current does that all the time; it alternates up and down very quickly. All of these small, polarizable bits in the substrate flick back and forth all the time. Absorbing energy and generating heat is exactly the same way that a microwave oven works. In that case, it’s a water molecule that’s vibrating back and forth, generating heat. But overall, generating heat is bad in two ways. First, you have to get rid of it, so in big server farms, there’s a lot of heat to get rid of because you’ve generated a lot of extra heat. Second, it saps the signal, so if you put 100 in, 20 will be used for heat and only 80 will be used for the signal. You end up with a loss of signal.

The property we talk about for that is called the dissipation factor, which is a number; it’s dimensionless. The dissipation factor in a vacuum is zero, more or less, so you have no loss. And this number continues to rise depending on the kind of material you have and the frequency. There has been a big push to get that number lower and on the substrate side. About the lowest that we know of so far are PTFE materials, which are extremely difficult to polarize because the structure is pretty simple. It’s a carbon backbone with fluorine atoms on either side. As fluorine is highly reactive the atoms get as far away from each other as they can, so they form a twisted helix and force themselves in position so that they can’t vibrate, which is whyPTFE has a very low loss. Materials like FR-4 are very polarizable; they contain moisture and all kinds of things that can be polarized. You end up with orders of magnitude difference in loss, so the drive has been towards that low side.

The other big problem is copper. It has a certain roughness on one side, particularly to stick it to the substrates, you don’t want the copper falling off. Typically, in modern circuitry, the copper thickness is 17 microns or one-half ounce, sometimes even less. For a 17-micron foil, the treatment on the back of it can be five or even eight microns, even half of the total thickness can be treated, which is very rough; it’s like hills and valleys or a mountain range.

The problem is as you reach higher and higher frequencies, the electrons travel in the outside of the conductor—not through the bulk of it. Even at relatively low frequencies, you find all of the electrons flowing to the outside of the conductor. One side is pretty smooth and flat while the other side is very mountainous and hilly. The electrons have to travel a further distance on the lower side and through a higher resistance path. That compromises signal integrity as well. As you reach a higher frequency, you must have lower profiles on the copper down to submicron level, which is a bit of a challenge on the copper side.

You must also consider the reinforcement in the substrate, which is formed from a resin and a reinforcement. PTFE will most likely be the lowest loss that we have because we normally use glass fibers. Glass fibers are used for reinforcement because they’re very stable, hold everything in place, and stop things from moving around. They’re pretty inert, so you can process them through wet chemistry and not have them dissolve or become damaged. The problem is that the electrical properties of the resin and glass fiber are quite different.

You might think of the dielectric constant of the resin, and it could be a value in the order of three. The dielectric constant of the glass is at least double that, so around six, and it has a capacitive effect. How much charge can the material carry and hold? Glass holds a lot more than the resin does. If you try to send signals down there with a pair of conductors—like a differential pair—and one of those conductors runs along a bit of laminate with a lot of glass underneath it and another part of the pair runs along a bit that’s got a lot of resin underneath it, they see a very different dielectric property of the material. One of those conductors has a significantly slower signal speed compared to the other one, and you wind up with mismatches in the signal integrity.

To read the full article, which appeared in the May 2019 issue of PCB007 Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Why Designers Need to Be at the SMTA Additive Electronics Conference

10/18/2019 | I-Connect007
In a recent interview, Kelly Dack and Tara Dunn (Omni PCB president and conference co-chair) discussed why designers need to attend the SMTA Additive Electronics Conference. Tara will also be attending and moderating a panel discussion at the conference.

Additive Electronics Conference Set for October 2019 Debut

10/15/2019 | Kelly Dack
Kelly Dack and Tara Dunn talk about the upcoming conference "Additive Electronics: PCB Scale to IC Scale" on October 24, 2019, hosted by SMTA in San Jose, California, and why it's an important event for people to attend—especially those involved in the design process.

Decreasing Bend Radius and Improving Reliability—Part I

10/11/2019 | Kelsey Smith, All Flex
Many of the issues that arise when using a flex circuit come from a lack of knowledge about how to properly design one, especially when the circuit is required to bend.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.