Improving Copper Distribution in Pattern Plating Using Simulation Software


Reading time ( words)

DFM guidelines may offer some qualitative rules about aiming for uniformity of copper distribution within a layer and maintaining symmetry in a stackup, but generally, these refer to inner-layer copper and relate to avoiding pressure differentials in the laminating press and bow-and-twist in the reflow oven.

What about the outer layers if the design is to be manufactured by pattern plating, particularly if conductor cross-sections and plated-through-hole finished diameters are critical? Does the PCB designer understand the principles of pattern electroplating? Circuit features in sparsely populated areas will take more than their nominal share of the deposited copper.

And what about panelisation? Is the design required to be delivered as a multiple on an assembly panel? Or is it cost-effective to manufacture only if incorporated into a multi-image production panel—whether of the same design or a mixture of designs?

From the point of view of the PCB fabricator, it is clearly bad practice to interfere with a customer’s design by adding balancing copper as non-functional areas within the layout, unless this is done in consultation with the designer and formally approved before the design is signed-off.

But on a panel, balancing copper—alternatively termed “copper thieving”—may be legitimately added to the panel border and in the spaces in between individual boards in order to improve the uniformity of electroplated copper thickness distribution by effectively stealing some of the plating current that would otherwise tend to be concentrated on sparse features.

From a production standpoint, if the individual boards in a multi-image panel have an uneven copper distribution, or if two or more designs are incorporated in the panel, there could be some benefit in arranging their relative positions and orientations to improve the uniformity of electroplating. Maybe counterintuitively, the yield might be improved by putting fewer images on the panel with more space between them to allow for thieving.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the April 2020 issue of PCB007 Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Benchmarking Your Process Engineering

04/29/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Mark Thompson has been in bare board fabrication for over 30 years. He is now laying out printed circuit boards at Monsoon Solutions, a high-tech design bureau near Seattle, Washington. With Mark’s extensive hands-on knowledge of PCB manufacturing, he brings a unique perspective to PCB design. In this discussion with the I-Connect007 editorial team, Mark shares what’s important from a process engineer’s point of view, and how to stay on top of evaluating and benchmarking your manufacturing process, along with insights from his new role as a designer.

Isola Releases IS550H Material

04/26/2021 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Nolan Johnson speaks with Michael Gay of Isola and Chris Hunrath of Insulectro about the release of their new halogen-free, high-thermal reliability material, which they hope fills the gap in the market between epoxies and polyimides.

EIPC Technical Snapshot: Supply Chain and Material Price Pressures

04/26/2021 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
EIPC’s seventh Technical Snapshot webinar on April 14 was timely and appropriate. In the context of current supply chain issues and material price pressures facing the PCB industry, particularly in Europe, the EIPC team brought together an outstanding group of experts—each a leading authority in his field—to analyse and comment upon the areas of concern and to respond to questions raised by a capacity audience. As Alun Morgan said, “If you don’t use the European supply chain, you won’t have it anymore!”



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.