-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueThe Growing Industry
In this issue of PCB007 Magazine, we talk with leading economic experts, advocacy specialists in Washington, D.C., and PCB company leadership to get a well-rounded picture of what’s happening in the industry today. Don’t miss it.
The Sustainability Issue
Sustainability is one of the most widely used terms in business today, especially for electronics and manufacturing but what does it mean to you? We explore the environmental, business, and economic impacts.
The Fabricator’s Guide to IPC APEX EXPO
This issue previews many of the important events taking place at this year's show and highlights some changes and opportunities. So, buckle up. We are counting down to IPC APEX EXPO 2024.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
Closing the Gap Between Design and Fab
February 26, 2014 |Estimated reading time: 1 minute
Recently, I’ve been doing a bit of investigation to find out what really needs to happen to get a good turnaround on designs--from idea to a working board, that is. There is a more pressing need than ever for ECAD vendors to do some close work with PCB fabricators, but it seems that ECAD vendors have a complete disconnect. I think that CAD tool vendors in general have done a fantastic job of making design easier and faster, but there is still a huge gap between what a PCB designer intends, thinks, and lays out in CAD and what a PCB fabricator needs in order to build and assemble the boards with reasonable yields. It’s one (good) thing to support universal data transfer formats, but that’s not an automatic fix-all, either. What I’m really talking about is DFM.
Over the years, IPC has made efforts to fix this disconnect. This is why the current CID and CID+ programs have an emphasis on DFX. For those unfamiliar, DFX means “design for x”, where x = manufacturing, assembly, and test--together we call it Design for eXcellence. The thought process here is that if PCB designers are trained to know the materials, processes, steps and limitations of a PCB fab, then they will inherently know how to design the PCB to be “manufacturable.” Part of this also is the classification of PCBs based on complexity and producibility levels.
Of course, the designer then has a new job as a kind of mediator between engineering management, product marketing, and the fab: having to laboriously explain why the product they are working on cannot be designed the way marketing wants it, or why moving a button one inch to the left will cause the product assembly costs to significantly rise. It’s a big ask for designers to have to bear in mind all the fabrication and assembly processes, and then have to turn around and put these practical limitations up against the wants of other stakeholders. If I were hiring designers, I would limit my search to CID-certified people for this reason alone. Yet, in a sense, this is like having a license to drive with little or no actual driving experience.Read the full article here.Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the February 2014 issue of The PCB Magazine.